|
Quazen > Tags > poker
|
 |
poker |
|
|
 | | Texas Hold'em 101: Part One | | by schmitty602, Aug 12, 2008 | | The rules of Texas Hold'em and how to play it. After reading this, one should be able to follow a game without getting lost and confused. | | Comments(0) Liked It: 0 |
|
 | | NL Hold'em: Bluffing | | by Ivar Abusdal, Aug 4, 2008 | | The different bluffs and lines you often should consider when you play No-Limit Hold’em. Remember to mix up your game, and don’t overuse a single line. The key is to just do it enough to get away with it and still be unpredictable. | | Comments(0) Liked It: 1 |
|
 | | NL Hold'em: 3-betting | | by Ivar Abusdal, Aug 4, 2008 | | 3-betting can be a somewhat confusing subject for most poker players. Still it’s an incredible important weapon in any serious poker player’s repertoire. You simply won’t survive on the poker table without it. In this article I will try to clarify the most important concepts you should consider before you decide to 3-bet. | | Comments(0) Liked It: 2 |
|
 | | NL Hold'em: Analyzing Your General Stats | | by Ivar Abusdal, Aug 3, 2008 | | In this article I will talk about some of the most common leaks a lot of No-Limit Hold’em players have. You should note that for some of the stats to be relevant, you should have a quite large sample-size of hands. The article is written with 6-max cash games in mind. When I evaluate concrete stats, the conclusions are based on empirical data from large databases. This means that they will tell you what kind of stats most big winners at mid-stakes (200NL-1000NL) tend to have, not necessarily what is “correct”. As you understand a strong player can therefore have stats outside the ranges I give. | | Comments(0) Liked It: 2 |
|
 | | NL Hold'em: Polarized and "value-based" Ranges | | by Ivar Abusdal, Aug 2, 2008 | | In this article I will explain the concept of why and when to use a polarized or a "value-based" range in Hold'em. It is a quite a heavy subject, and most (even very strong) players don't have a good understanding of it. Many of them have developed a feel for it over time, but I have never seen anybody write or talk about it in any depth. | | Comments(0) Liked It: 4 |
|
 | | The Poker Conundrum | | by ANDY N, Jul 23, 2008 | | I don't claim to be a poker expert but I was under the understanding that winning the most hands is the objective. Also part of the game is bluffing your opponent(s), which is a nice way of saying deceiving them. But doesn't it really come down to the cards most of the time? | | Comments(0) Liked It: 6 |
|
|
