The Universe in the context of the theory of everything.
Some claim that there was no really "then" then at all. The others argue about the quantum leap from eternity into time ( Dr. Sydney Coleman of Harvard, USA ). The third speculate that on the other side of Time Zero is another universe, i.e. anti-universe or a universe going back in time.
Perhaps, to understand that problem fully, one needs to link a quantum theory of subatomic particles with the Einstein's general theory of relativity. This is in fact an ultimate goal of the Beyond Einstein program recently announced in the scientific and academic circles. And in this regard a proposed earlier "theory of everything" might bring a really comprehensive result which will be mutually satisfactory for all proponents and opponents.
The better understanding of a nature of black holes as string channels between island flat universes ( or rather verses within the one and only Universe of matter ( to be more precise, visible and dark matter in a cluster-type juncture ) and anti-matter structured in a form of an infinite matrix of space, time and gravity may lead to a proper realization of an evolution in the universe. The genesis in our ( uni- ) verse might be not an "absolute moment" ( because nothing is absolute in the Universe ) but rather a relative point in a string of bendings and deformations ( diffractions ) of the above-mentioned matrix Universe ( see works of Dr. Martin Bojowald of the Max Plank Institute in Germany, Dr. Stephen Hawking of the Cambridge University in USA, Dr. John Archibald Wheeler of Princeton, USA, academicians Yakov Zeldovich, Alexei Zolotov and Andrei Sakharov of Russia, Dr. Saul Perlmutter of SNAP in UK, Dr. Lawrence Krauss USA, Edward Witten of The Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, USA and others ).
A black hole as an infinite density of mass held by gravity in the tiniest spot of space emitting no light or X-ray and gamma radiation beyond its event horizon ( except in cases of supernovae ) and absorbing any substances and objects of visible and invisible matter ( gas, cosmic dust, radiation, planets and even stars, i.e. Higgs and WHIMP particles on a subatomic level ) are probably a part of a super structural matrix which is permitted by anti-gravity unpredictable dark energy constituting a "cosmological constant" of Albert Einstein. This matrix includes both matter and anti-matter in tiny asymmetrical proportions on the Universal scale.
In case of a dark energy a special theory of relativity is more applicable and preferable since it excludes gravity as a determinant. Due to this fact the cosmological constant is infinitely small but never can be zero because :
it has mass and
there is no absolute zero in the Universe, especially in the cosmic environment.
This matrix structure might be quite stable and static as well as sessile to a quantum genesis of any constituent verse in the Universe. It can remind a Rubik cube characterized by endless juxtaposed string possibilities to bring finally evenly structured and harmonic result. It is a multi-layer, non-linier matrix-type Universe not multiverse. However it pre-supposes an existence of all kinds of constituting verses. Thus, an expansion or contraction of any verse as an element of the Universe at an accelerated or decelerated rate is quite possible depending on a quantitative correlation and a degree of inner gravity between matter, dark matter and dark energy ( cosmological constant ) in a single individual verse like ours ( in which matter constitutes 5%, dark matter 23-24% and dark energy 71-72% ). The matrix Universe includes multiverses and its mass is 1 ( E=M in a black hole ). Verses are held together in the Universe by dark gluonic energy which is a constant. The matrix is a totality with limitless combinations and configurations within it in terms of time, space ( size, shape, composition ), mass and gravity. It possess only mass ( M ) where M=E (energy ) and all other characteristics are irrelevant.
At the same time a principle of duality ( symmetry or rather tiny asymmetry ) should be also taken into consideration. Each constituency of space, time and physical existence in general has its counterpart without any exception both of which are in correlative and antagonistic, supportive and contradicting interrelations or inter-strings or inter-membranes. Thus, within super-asymmetrical matrix it is feasible to speculate about laws of diversified tiny asymmetry. Therefore a theory of a super-asymmetrical everything based on the non-linier and linier, vertical and horizontal, positive and negative, forward and backward , right/left and left/right diversity in a shape of Rubik cube with flat strings or membranes can really work well. It makes possible an existence of CPT ( charge, parity and time ) normal and reversed verses juxtaposed in infinite diversified configurations.
The static matrix which is motionless in itself might explain the antigravity dark energy ( due to the absence of torque in relation to the matrix as a totality ) as a transcendent , filling gluonic modus. However within this matrix structure a rotation as a major form of motion - which also might constitute the fifth dimension - produces quantum interactions triggering and awakening certain parts or constituencies / strings ( as in the Rubik cube ). Time ( past, present and future ), space ( length, width and height ) and motion ( gravity ) in this super-structural matrix-type totality are of no essence. They all become relevant and come into existence only in each individual constituent verse of the Universe based on quantum leap genesis or a beginning of a new verse.
The dark energy as a cosmological matrix constant nourishes and carries endless, limitless, uncertain possibilities, options and combinations triggered by strings of a counter-balanced asymmetry. The possible characteristics of dark energy ( which can be proved under the Beyond Einstein program ) include the following:
physical absence of visible light ( E= +/- Mc2 does not work here );
anti-gravity ( E= +/- Mc2 + gravity does not work either );
E=M where E is dark energy and M is mass in static form;
time, space and motion are irrelevant;
dark E is everywhere. It is transcendent and permeating as a gluonic modus ;
it expands and contracts within the Universe making all constituent verses do the same;
its transformations are sources of big bangs;
its mass is infinitely small but never zero ( because E=0 if M=0 and there is the nothing void ).
The theory of super-asymmetrical matrix everything combines both the theories of tiny vibrating strings linking matrix constituencies of the Universe, of lea quantum genesis and of uncertainties as well as the Newtonian laws of mechanics and the Einstein's physics of relativity. It fits perfectly everything but requires definitely some fine tuning and specifying. The laws of super-asymmetrical everything within super-structural , unimaginable so far matrix are applicable to any geometry, color, configuration, type, size, form and reason of material and immaterial existence. It embraces everything on all visible and invisible levels without specific reference to time, space and motion ( gravity ) due to multiple bendings, bi-polarization and diffractions. It appears thus far that the matrix Universe adheres to principles of negating the negations, of dialectics and of a struggle and unity of the opposites . A comparison ( just for a simplification ) of this complex Universe with the Rubik cube might help to solve this "divine squandrel" despite Einstein's assertion that " The problem of GOD is too vast for a human's limited mind".
Not bad. However some points are arguable. But in general the concept might work.
#2 by Antony, Jul 25, 2008
Full of infomartion. Good concept of ideas. 5/5
#3 by richard, Jul 26, 2008
The theory of everything is really likable y many scientists who want to unite different ideas into one harmoneous theory. They lack some sientific facts now to do so and sometimes imagination. But it will prevail eventually. The article is good and gives many ideas to think about.
#4 by Konstantin , Jul 26, 2008
This article goes out into many directions where the average person surely does not explore daily. Its material and facts are well put together and support the thesis well. Certainly a topic which will be brought up more often in the future. Two thumbs up.
#5 by jenny, Jul 28, 2008
i like it. Very comprehensive.
#6 by tom, Jul 29, 2008
The artical is good. It promts many ideas and give a chance to think about the genesis, God and who we are. It would be nice to interacr with the author and discuss several topics touched in the article.
#7 by mike, Jul 30, 2008
I read this staff with a pleasure. Probably I did not understand it completely but it sounds great. 5 points !!!
#8 by josh, Jul 30, 2008
A cosmological constant : does it really exist ? If our universe is expanding but it is flat then there should be something to hold it together, I accept the idea of a theory of everything. However future discoveries might contribute to it and thus a better understanding of the Universe. I agree that there is one Universe and many verses. This is a good article written on a good therization basis.
#9 by patrick, Aug 2, 2008
I never thought that I will be hooked on this subject. But with every article I read on this topic I develop some kind of taste in understanding what the universe is. This author touched many subjects here which require some special reading in order to understand it completely. Great job.
#10 by sandy, Aug 5, 2008
Many things I do not understand. But there is very much information in a nutshell. It needs a certain background to understand all that.
#11 by Lev, Aug 6, 2008
I have read this article with big interest. As the great philosopher Kant said- there are two things, which people deeply do not understand: That is the star heaven above us and the moral law inside us. I think the problem -What is Universe - belongs to such things. This hypotheses is original and has all rights to exist. No one is able to prove it, but also no one can refute. This hypotheses can be a base for serious discussions and this is one of its achievements.
#12 by chris, Aug 6, 2008
Interesting.
#13 by Dan, Aug 7, 2008
I agree that it is interesting and arguable because nobody can really prove anything so far. In my opinion the univers caries a lot of mysteries and the article is right that our mind is too limited to grasp it. This is crystal clear that everything is duly organized in the universe and it is balanced in its continuing development. God knows exactly what he does.
#14 by aleks,aug6,2008.good!, Aug 7, 2008
Very interesting
#15 by Myra K., Aug 7, 2008
Very interesting, though quite a lot of points are as usually arguable mainly due to the fact that those \\\"lots of things\\\" are mostly hypothetic and intangible. I think have issues with people mixing in an inappropriate way religion and science. I think everything\\\'s pretty much scientifically explanatory, too bad we can\\\'t get beyond our galaxy. Whether Universe is endless or not and how it\\\'s being \\\"carried\\\" will always bother people but not to that extent that it will create certains discomforts to us as human beings, I guess, we can elaborate endlessly about the endlessness and the phyisics and the metaphysics of the Universe.
#16 by victor, Aug 7, 2008
good very
#17 by Frank Cacossa, Aug 7, 2008
Quite interesting. Great job Slava!
#18 by Ollo, Aug 8, 2008
Interesting, especially if the nature is structured in harmonious and well-organized way. The thery of everything has its future for sure but some additional data definetely need to prove it. It will be a great breakthrough for science, art life in general.
#19 by mary, Aug 9, 2008
I like this article. It carries many interesting and potential ideas. And I disagree with some comments that nobody knows for sure the hings about the Universe. Over te years we accumulated a lot of knowledge and had a chance to look back in time almost 10-12 billions of years back when our universe was born. We learnt many elements of this huge puzle but so far scientists and theorists are incapable to essemble them in one coherent structure.
#20 by dan, Aug 9, 2008
But theorists cannot probably do iy because they lack some other important and vital data to put two and two together.
They try to atack the puzzle from different angles using radio telescopes,space stations and telescopic equipment, particle accelerators and colliders in order to find te ultimate truth and a starting point. It all helps to understand who we are.
#21 by kira, Aug 9, 2008
I read this article and another one about five strange astronomical features. They just complement each other. The universe is so diversified and unique. This is awsome.
#22 by alexander, Aug 10, 2008
Facinating. The author managed to realize and accomadate many interesting notions which more and more gain public interests.
#23 by peter, Aug 10, 2008
I read many articles about the composition of the universe but this one sums up actually much of known data in a concise form. 10 points.
#24 by Eugene, Aug 11, 2008
Our universe is 13.7 billion years old. The Sun is 5-5.5 billion years and the Earth is 2.2 billion. I agree that the Universe is a homogeneous and harmoneous structure which at its birth had some sort of a genome determining its future development. There should be some logic in its extension.
#25 by Andy, Aug 12, 2008
I like it. It is interesting and facinating. Good job.
#26 by garry, Aug 12, 2008
I think it is a nice piece of work. To read it properly one needs a special background on this topic. It gives a possibility to look at the universe not only from the point of view of physics but also philosophy.
#27 by John Ferg, Aug 13, 2008
A good compilation of theories Slava and well thought out. The ability to comprehend such a huge amount of scientific info about astronomical physics and theories and then impart this knowledge in a comprehensive and understandble form is great esp to those of us who do not have much subject matter but can grasp your ideas and concepts.
#28 by tom, Aug 14, 2008
Probably, scientists need to collect more data to unify all theories in one theory of everything and space exploration as well as observations from earth using laws of physics and cosmology. I like this article as the author makes a good attempt to do it. But in a short article it is practically impossible.
#29 by elena, Aug 15, 2008
The universe is our home where we live. It contains 200 billion galaxies of 100 illon stars each. The scale is huge and difficut to grasp. But there should be some kind of an order or a harmony and the Big Bang might be only one of big bangs in a chain reaction. Black hole are most probably are not holes at all but funnels or funnelling membrains. If matter disappears in them, it should appear somewhere because energy can convert but it is never totally lost. It is preserved in Nature. A lot of answers to glabal problems can be found on Earth. I like the article since it is mind-stimulating.
#30 by mike, Aug 16, 2008
I like it but some things are difficult for an undertanding. Still it is facinating.
#31 by julian, Aug 17, 2008
This question racks the brains of peoples for centuries and only now we are approaching the real answer which is still quite distant. I think, that this problem reqirs both a scientific approach and a philosophical theorization. And the article strives to do it. However it is too short for this. The author could try to do it in a book format.
#32 by greg, Aug 17, 2008
Iy is a good material. Because this staff helps to understand the universe and thus to comprehend better who and what we are.
#33 by Arnold, Aug 18, 2008
I am amazed how difficult things and theories are put in a simple but not a simplified way . Real science is here to show the complexity of the subjet. But it is not overcerebrial.
#34 by Andria, Aug 19, 2008
I like it. It explains to me a lot. Many thngs are uncear but scientists will find the truth.
#35 by Arkady, Aug 19, 2008
This is a serious and solid mateial in the article. it is not a popular staff. But this is not too clever. I like it.
#36 by Dan, Aug 21, 2008
Amazing things are explained in a way that I understand. I want the author to elaborate on some things and probably make some other articles on this subject. I loke the sraff.
#37 by Maria, Aug 22, 2008
I was advised this article by a friend and I found it really complicated to understand but interesting and mind-bogging at the same time. To imagine the sacle of things is next to impossible. This is life and nature.Two thumbs up!
#38 by Alex, Aug 24, 2008
It is groovy. And we talk here about endless possibilities. Besides the inerse is stilll in an evolution because some stars and galaxies are born, merged and died. In my opinion Black holes are a key to understand the nature of a universe: in the center of each galaxy there is a black hole. It sort of requlates how some matter disappears and how it is produced as weell as a formation of new stars in its vicinity and thus planets from cosmic gas and dust. Black holes are keepers of energy required for a development.
#39 by dan, Aug 25, 2008
I agree about black holes. They are regulating membraine-type channels. Besides there is an inter or rather intra-balance with a slight assymetry in the universe. Some mechanism should keep it working. There is no spill=over matter in the universe. All matter - visible or dark or anti-matter - carries out its own function within this universal balance.
#40 by Frank, Aug 28, 2008
The article is doog. But who knows exactly what is the universe. Althoug there is a lt of scientific evidence and mathematical calculations, still many misteries remain. Cool staff and snazy..
#41 by Kate, Sep 1, 2008
He wrote 2 articles and both are good. I will keep an eye on this author because he writes good and explains difficult things in a simple languae. Besides there are many scientific facts and data which are grouped together. I like his work.
#42 by terry, Sep 4, 2008
What is the universe - do you know ? I do not know. Nobidy knows.
#43 by Glenn, Sep 6, 2008
Maybe, nobody knows what is the universe in details but our knowledge about is growing rapidly and one day we will solve the puzzle. Yje article puts many questions but well composed. I like it.
#44 by Andy, Sep 8, 2008
Nicely drafted. The integrated article which desrves all five.
#45 by Sandy, Sep 10, 2008
The universe is me. Why ? H`e told to back off but I like him and this is my universe.
#46 by Al, Sep 12, 2008
The mystery of the universe stirs our minds but to grasp its scales truly tough, we just a tiny part of it and maybe the most intelligent since the scientists have not found any other real life thus far. We are blessed to solve all these mysteries.
#47 by Alex, Sep 15, 2008
One can argue about the details but the theory itself seemsto be right. I like the story.
#48 by Al, Sep 16, 2008
What is the universe who ever might know because it seems that the more we know about it the less are our chances to create one reliable and cmprehensive theory about it. So far we face more mysteries than discoveries. The article attempts to generalize on many notions and premises and succeeds in doing so to some extent.
#49 by Bobby, Sep 18, 2008
Mind-stimulating staff which contains multiple otions and premises on a high level of a generalization.
#50 by Stan, Sep 20, 2008
Very interesting thery. Concise and nicely drafted. I like it.
#51 by Lily, Sep 23, 2008
All is possible. I do not argue but quite agree with many things. When reading this material I am impressed with such volume of data presented in a quite readable way. The author is a good and talented communicator.
#52 by Michael, Sep 27, 2008
This is more philosophical than physical question and I enjoyed reading this article because the author tried and succeeded in combining them. It is a comprehensive material wich needs a detailed continuation. Thanks.
#53 by Stan, Oct 4, 2008
What is our universe seems a mystery so far as there are more and more questions than answers. But I believe that one day we will find the clue and this theory of everything will become a unified theory of the universe origin and development.
#54 by Roger, Oct 5, 2008
I like it. So many comments because, maybe, people like it seriously.
#55 by Sumo, Oct 8, 2008
I think that universe is one and me personally is comfortable with the thought that we are the only ones here. We do not need anybody at all. Life is great and I enjoy it. My friend likes this article and I don't know. But I am with him.
#56 by Ron, Oct 12, 2008
His articles are terribly informative, comprehensive and should be included in a book because it will be a bestseller. So many interesting facts and theories, philosophical and religious ideas and thoughts. I enjoy every bit of it.
#57 by Catherine, Oct 14, 2008
O.K.I found all his articles which I will recommend all my college dudes and girls. Awesome. Why don't they write text books in the same informative and concise form. My professor will be impressed with my knowledge. I kiss this guy whatever is his name Slava. Starange name!
#58 by Andrew, Nov 19, 2008
Amazingly and exceptionally interesting staff. I hope that this theory explains a lot and really everything.We need one to unify our perceptions and bilieves.
#59 by Anton, Nov 21, 2008
They talk about this guy who wrote all these stories. They are very interesting. My friends were rifght that he hel[ps people and students to learn complex things in the simple manner. I like the article much.////And it is very reviewing
#60 by Kate, Nov 28, 2008
I agree with the writer that this theory of everything can be used to explain a lot but needs to be streamlined and systematized. Any object with mass has intrinsically energy which is released once there is motion in a form of light. Recently they confirmed this equation of Einstein in prractice after 103 years. And this is true about life and motionless things. Energy is always presered no matter what.
#61 by Kolain, Nov 29, 2008
That I read the best on this theme
#62 by Olga, Dec 2, 2008
This article gave to me many answers which I was looking for in different sources. It has a lot of good ideas which guide my research on the subject matter. I like it much.
